A friend and I were investigating a few investment properties targets on the HUD repo list. When I asked how he planned to acquire the property, I was stunned by his answer. CASH. The mostly green stuff that you can put in your wallet.
My knee-jerk reaction was that he was wasting valuable ROI by not using borrowed funds to purchase the investment. LEVERAGE, as I have always been led to believe, had to be the only way to buy an investment property.
I put this thought into the space in my brain that still works and doesn’t have any dust or spiders living in the corners. As uncomfortable as the thought of paying cash was, I could feel a paradigm shift coming on…
If you grew up in the same era as me (Stetson University – Class of ’91) you were probably conditioned to believe in leverage, just as I was. It’s what I was taught in college; it’s how my online brokerage margin account works; Danny DeVito even made a movie about it. Leverage is the key to getting ahead quickly in the financial world. Or so I thought.
Out came a legal pad and my handy HP 10BII calculator (CCIM approved) to factor rates of return on investment.
Generally, the properties we looked at were 3-bedroom, 2-bath, single-family homes that were bought new, 3-3½ years ago, for around $120,000. Remember when 80/20 zero-down mortgages were the way to go? Now they are back on the market after being foreclosed and could be bought for $60,000 – $75,000.
So which is better, buying one investment property and actually owning it or buying several leveraged properties for the same amount? It’s still just $75,000, right?





